Posts Tagged ‘world news’

People Live in Iran

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

Mild Warning for the General Reader: This post has no ‘mocko’ in it. It’s just bloody serious. If you expect funny stuff, get out of here right now and come back later.

Serious Warning for the Homo Politicus: I follow politics because I live in this world as it is. Commenting on politics is not my cup of tea. If you are a politician or a politician’s henchman, get out of here after reading this post and please don’t come back. You won’t get the message anyway.

*

When I write my usual stuff, it normally comes to me and I just write it and in the end I have to look for a title. When I decided to write on this subject, the title came to me first. It was ‘People Die in Iran’.  I changed it to ‘People Live in Iran’ because I find the ones that are alive infinitely more important than the other ones. And this includes the martyrs.

*

Let’s just set the background a wee bit:

I was born, I grew up and I was educated in the European Communist Block. It was dictatorship all right: the kind of regime that would send your mum to jail for cracking a joke about how you couldn’t find milk at the supermarket. If you think that’s a joke in itself, piss off my blog right now!

The communists always referred to what they were doing as The Revolution. Guess what?! Another revolution came and threw them out. I was a student then. People were shot in the streets big time. Mates of mine were beaten, mates of mates of mine were run over by tanks and mates of their mates got bullets through their young intellectual heads.  It took years to tell good from bad and the murky waters have not cleared yet, nearly one generation after.

*

Now let’s have a look at the stage overall as the actors have a dress rehearsal:

We have a tiny planet, the only one we’ve seen up close. There are loads of us, of different colours, beliefs and ambitions, but generally speaking a pretty murderous lot altogether. We shoot our neighbors in the name of our border, we poison our cousins in the name of the wealthy deceased relative and we cannot help hunting down our ideological foes. Of course, some of us get better at this game and acquire more powerful ammo and softer tactics, while others just like it to be basic instinct-based and they do whatever it takes to keep the fight on their ground, as they know it better.  Well, this is only a low resolution picture of our reality. In fact not only that the picture is very highly defined and conflicts can occur between some pixels that happen to live close enough to each other (see the former Yugoslavia in the 90s) but the picture itself lives not only in our synchronic present, but also in the diachronic realm of history.  It’s like:

“Good morning!  I came to – err, look at this knife, I sharpened it – I came to stab you today.”

“Why, you are my best friend? By the way, it looks really sharp indeed! Good work, my friend!”

“Shut up! I WAS your friend! Don’t ever call me that again! ”

“But – why?”

“Your ancestors spat on my ancestors’ shrine!”

“Yes. That was five hundred years ago.”

“I’ve only found out last night on the news!” (Stabbing action follows.)

*

Centre stage:

Iran. These days it’s Iran.

I now live in a Western country and I have a lot of concern about what’s going to happen in the future. Not the diet thing, I know I’m getting fatter and every week I spend one minute less on the court and one minute more in the Lawn Tennis Club’s bar; I mean serious stuff, the kind of stuff that’s on Fox TV or Google, where smart people gather. I can read. Believe you me: I can do it a notch better than I can write and much faster than  I can spell. I am also watching TV (I’m big on watching TV; I’ll challenge you any day at a TV-watching competition!). I can listen to a bit of radio in my car and I’m even coming to grips with this computer-Internet funky stuff. I hear about this Iranian business and I remember I heard about Iran many years ago, when they were fighting the-then-good-guys from Iraq. But I had also heard of Iran even before that: The Iranian Hostage Crisis – remember? And even before that: there was a revolution – The Islamic Revolution.

You know, the world I live in today and the world I used to live in many years ago are so different. Yet MY world is pretty much the same. Even after the media bombardment I see it quite the same. Perhaps it is because I have both angles.  But think of those who only see one. Are you in Iran? – If yes, you’ve seen the same kind of stuff for the last thirty years or so. Are you in the States? – If yes, you might have seen what you were expecting to see every day of your life. Now try to put yourselves in the other guy’s place!

I simply can’t. If I were in Iran these days, would I be on the Ahmadinejad side? Would I rather be with the opposition? The American way is to be on the firing side of the gun, not on the receiving end of the bullet. However, the Obama administration is quite soft on Iran. He has loads of military stuff to move out of Iraq. It’s like when you play chess: touch a figure, lift it up from the board and you must put it down somewhere: retire or attack are not choices; to put that damn thing down is your only choice once you’ve lifted it!

*

A  back stage dialogue:

When I was a student in my other country, the communist one, I met an Iranian guy at a party. This is the only Iranian I ever saw save the TV ones I see shot in the streets of Tehran and their more publicized leaders. He was studying law and he told me he already had a diploma in medicine from some US school and a masters degree in whatever else from Oxford. Judging by age, he could have been my father. Judging by his spending habits, he could have been my life-time sponsor (so I wouldn’t have to write this for elusive money that never comes from advertising). We were having beers. He was paying. I liked the guy. With all due respect, I’m not gay, but I just liked the guy, the way he was buying me drinks and not chatting up my girlfriend. I asked him how come he’s studying when he could be teaching or practicing medicine.  This is the answer he gave me twenty yeas ago:

“My family was very rich and powerful. My family was one of the top families in what you call Iran and what is in fact Persia, by its true name. This is the country where we believe civilization was born. Persia was and still is the richer country in the world. During centuries the Persians were influenced by the Arabs. Our religion, Zoroastrianism, became threatened by Islam but it still remained the same. When the Islamic Revolution imposed Islam over the whole country, my family was slaughtered or imprisoned for being rich and for being of the old religion. I was a student overseas then and I still am. I have access to their accounts that were not seized by the Islamic regime. I shall be a student until I can go back to my country as a free man. There may be a price on my head as we speak and you may be the very one who gives me in.”

Indeed I was. Two decades later I let people hear about this conversation. I was a coward then. Sobering up and going to the authorities would have deported him and surely thrown me out of University, if not having me run over by a black official car with the number plate covered in mud.

I don’t even remember the name of this Persian guy. But I remember I told him to get another couple of beers and I asked him why was he in my country then, as mine was a bloody autocratic regime anyway. The only Iranian guy I ever met laughed:

“You too live under dictatorship, but yours is an ideological one. Nobody believes in communism. In my country, call it Iran or Persia, they have the worse form of dictatorship: the religious one. Many believe in it. When you die in communism, nobody is happy; one has to kill you. It’s in the job description.  When you die in a religious regime the one who kills you is happy because he knows it’s done in the name of God.”

What to Do with Your Michael Jackson Concert Tickets

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Media is bombarding you with stories of Michael Jackson’s death, interviews, comments and reviews of his career while CD/DVD shops owners and bigger guns like Sony Corp. are rubbing their hands. Yet what’s going to happen with the come-back tour, the sold-out concerts? (750,000 tickets were sold. That’s 0.75 million!)

death5

Few remember that ony a few weeks ago Jackson was postponing his first public performances big time. This is BBC on May 20th 2009:

<<Pop star Michael Jackson has delayed the opening four nights of his This Is It UK tour at London’s O2 arena.

Concert promoters AEG Live said the delay was necessary because the singer needed more time for dress rehearsals.

The first show, on 8 July, has been pushed back by five nights. Three other July dates will not take place until March 2010.

Fans, who were told of the rescheduled dates in an e-mail, have reacted with a mixture of anger and support.

“What difference is a week going to make in the grand scheme of things?” wrote Pam A on a Michael Jackson messageboard.

“I had plane tickets booked from Canada,” wrote a fan calling themselves janmic.

“I’m supposed to be returning home on July 9th. I am really not impressed.”

The affected dates are as follows:

8 July – moved to 13 July, 2009
10 July – moved to 1 March, 2010
12 July – moved to 3 March, 2010
14 July – moved to 6 March, 2010

President of AEG Live, Randy Phillips, said the delay had been prompted by Jackson and his creative director, Kenny Ortega.>>

If you have a ticket for Michael Jackson’s concerts, what do you do? Do you go for the refund? Take the cash back and buy a few burgers?
I reckon you should keep the ticket as its value will increase in time like any collectible item.
here’s the deal: if you’ve followed my advise, I’ll kindly accept 10% of your profit in 30 years time or just 5% in 40 years. In 50 years time I won’t charge you any commission.
Imagine if you had now a ticket to Elvis Presley’s last concert or to John Lennon’s! (Not that I believe we can compare the three stars. The only link between Michael and Elvis is that Jacko married the other one’s daughter and his link with John Lennon is that Jackson purchased half of The Beatles Catalogue.)

Is Michael Jackson Dead? If Yes, Who or What Killed Him? Voice Your Opinion!

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Do you really think he’s dead? At 50? With all his money? Or is it just a well crafted conspiracy?

(This 1996 New Zealand tour picture belongs to JOHN SELKIRK/Fairfax Media.)

death4

A.

There are unconfirmed reports that Michael Jackson could be alive and well and the dead person taken to the hospital in L.A. could be one of his many look-alikes. Unofficial reports claim that one of the stars hard-core fans, terminally ill, has agreed to take part in staging the death of “The King of Pop”.

Michael Jackson was said to be bankrupt and haunted by the aftermath of the child molestations accusations that all but ruined his reputation in the past decade.

The new concert tour Jackson was planning to start is said to have been just a decoy and also huge amounts of money are supposed to be disputed by his agents and the insurance companies.

Michael Jackson’s death will boost his records and perifinelia sales and somebody is set to make good money. Guess who?

B.

If Michael Jackson is indeed dead, the autopsy may confirm the cause. Until then, extreme Christian organizations believe that the star’s recent religious allegiance may have drawn the anathema upon him or that he was simply killed by the curse of the young boys he allegedly interfered with.

*

Choose option A or option B and place your opinion in a comment to this mockopost. Feel free to voice other opinions. Is Jackson dead? If yes, who or rather what killed him? The best conspiracy will be published as an independent post on the mockoblog.

How to Write a Blog (Featuring the Rule of Thumb for Blogging)

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

I’m new to the so-called blogosphere. And I hate it. I never wanted my site to be confused with a blog (though now you can find it listed at blogcatalog.com – despite their early refusal to accept it). The mockoblog is to the blog what Terminator 2 is to the first animal + weapon + hunter scratched on a cave wall by our ancestors: no better, no worse thing, just so bloody different!

Blogs have been around for quite some time now, not as long as I have been, but long enough for me to not read them at all until I started to write the mockoblog.

I’ve been doing my homework and this is what I found:

  1. Blogs are stupidly boring and amazingly superficial.
  2. People write blogs because they have nothing to say but this silence of their mind sounds better when some audience is around.
  3. There was/is actually an older term for blog and that is the diary (journal), the only two problems with this one being that you normally need some paper and a quill and that you are supposed to keep it to yourself, tucked under your pillow at least for a while. I cannot imagine a book printed after the death of an author and called “The Secret Blog of Mr. Jack the Ripper” while “The Unearthed Journal of a Certain Jack” makes more publishing sense.
  4. There are good blogs, but they must have two features: they are very specific (normally technical stuff) and they do not reach a large audience (for the same reason), which means that they are no blogs at all anyway.
  5. There are many blogs that relate to something that should never be spoken outside a private conversation because they certainly do not make the object of interest for anyone outside that conversation. Unfortunately these blogs are the bulk of the lot and the sillier they are, the more they get promoted because we, the readers, are as silly as you can imagine. There is no handy example for this kind of blog: 99% of all blogs are part of this category. Imagine: I write about how I burned my pancakes and you read it! Who’s stupid? Or imagine: you write about how you lost 12 ponds in a fortnight just to put it back again the following weekend! Who’s the dumbest?
  6. CONCLUSION: Blogs are Internet pollution. They should be banned or at least the authors should be charged about $1 per word and the readers should pay an access fee of at least $5 per letter to be allowed to even click on them. That would teach them both! (I think all the proceedings should go straight to the big corporates that are spending so much $$$ anyway. Perhaps Google and Microsoft should create a joint venture called Goosoft or Microgle and this entity should police thye proper usage of blogging across the human and robot worlds.)

Just in case you write a blog, here’s my advice:

a)      Get a pen and a piece of paper;

b)      Throw these old tools away as you won’t need them with your computer anyway;

c)       Buy the latest laptop and make sure it’s got all the wireless technology in it (I use a smart phone, which is smaller and far more mobile than a laptop PC or IBook, needs less battery power and can also call an emergency number).

d)      Get a good and reliable Internet connection (but also browse for free ones when you’re in the area).

e)      Start writing. (That’s the tricky part and it doesn’t always work straight away, so start experiencing something first and make it worth writing about).

f)       Problems? Try again!

g)      Once you start writing just be carful that the more you do it, the worse it’ll get, so chill: no writing is better than a lot of.

h)      Look at you PC screen, divide it in two with a horizontal line, and take 15% off the top and about 12% off the bottom, measure what’s left in the middle: that’s the height of what people may read. Now you have the length of your post.

i)        Never post things that are bigger than the eyes can see at a glance. Apply step (h) to width as well but if you have a wide screen monitor, consider that some people may not.

j)        Don’t post too often. What often means? Say you are a chef desperate to find some Guinea Pigs for his latest recipe: post every time you need to conduct a low budget experiment with volunteers. Say you are a movie star aged 24 and you target an audience of 50+, mostly opposite sex: post once every generation.

The Rule of Thumb for Blogging is: look at you, then look at you in the mirror: the one who looks smarter is more deceiving, so he/she should write the blog ‘cause the other one will surely read it.